Whereas committing to section out stamp responsibility for first residence consumers, neither of the 2 main events is promising to make it simpler for current owners to maneuver and keep away from paying stamp responsibility a second time, which is the primary rationale for reform within the first place. Addressing that disincentive is essential to capturing what NSW Treasury estimates to be a $10-billion-a-year financial dividend from stamp responsibility reform in the long run.


As an alternative, each main events’ insurance policies quantity to little greater than first residence consumers’ grants by one other identify. They could make it simpler for first-time consumers to save lots of a deposit, however historical past exhibits in addition they push up costs. What the federal government offers with one hand, the housing market will partly take again with the opposite.

Whereas Sydney home costs are actually falling at their quickest charge in many years – and are anticipated to fall 15-20 per cent in complete – these falls would merely return costs to the place they have been earlier than the pandemic when housing was nonetheless removed from reasonably priced.

So why aren’t our main events transferring rapidly to finish stamp responsibility for everybody?

In brief, as a result of stamp responsibility is important to serving to state governments pay the payments within the right here and now. The NSW authorities expects to gather $10 billion in stamp responsibility this monetary 12 months. These revenues pay to maintain our hospitals operating and faculties open.


Labor’s proposed giveaway for first-home consumers will value a mere fraction of that: $722 million over its first three years. The federal government’s will value $728 million over 4 years.

If we have been to eliminate stamp responsibility altogether, we’d have to interchange it with one thing else. And whereas there’s settlement from each main events that stamp responsibility ought to go, there isn’t a settlement about what ought to change it.

Economists need stamp responsibility changed with a broad-based land tax that’s levied annually based mostly on the worth of the land that individuals personal. In financial parlance, land tax is probably the most environment friendly tax obtainable to states as a result of it doesn’t distort folks’s selections. Whereas owners can keep away from paying stamp responsibility once more by refusing to maneuver home, land can’t be moved and land tax can’t be averted.

Whereas the NSW authorities was initially open to permitting all residence consumers to decide on between paying stamp responsibility or a land tax, NSW Labor has opposed even the federal government’s extra modest plans, arguing that the alternative land tax is a “perpetually tax”. In different phrases, NSW Labor is against the very tax that almost all economists wish to see change stamp responsibility.

Setting apart the very fact there’s already a perpetually tax on the household residence – all owners already pay council charges yearly – Labor’s place means stamp responsibility isn’t going wherever. Different choices, similar to elevating the GST to cowl the price of abolishing stamp responsibility, seem even much less possible.

Everybody now appears to agree that stamp responsibility ought to go. However till we agree what tax ought to change it, stamp responsibility received’t be going wherever.

Brendan Coates is Financial Coverage Program Director on the Grattan Institute.

The Opinion e-newsletter is a weekly wrap of views that may problem, champion and inform your personal. Enroll right here.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.