A jury reached its determination Thursday within the penalty trial of Nikolas Cruz, who gunned down 17 individuals at Marjory Stoneman Douglas Excessive Faculty in Parkland, Florida, in 2018.
The trial was to resolve whether or not to condemn Cruz to life in jail or the dying penalty.
The choice by the 12-person jury was decided about three months after opening statements started July 18 and after the jury obtained deliberation directions Wednesday. It is going to be introduced at 10:30 a.m.
Prosecutors had sought the dying penalty, whereas the protection needed life in jail. The jury needed to attain an unanimous determination for the dying sentence.
The gunman, then 19, had stormed the highschool on Valentine’s Day wielding an AR-15-style rifle and releasing a twig of bullets. He pleaded responsible final October to murdering 14 college students and three workers members within the Feb. 14, 2018, bloodbath.
Throughout closing arguments Tuesday, protection counsel Melisa McNeill instructed the jury earlier than they began deliberations: “At some point I promise you, you’ll ask your self, did I make the best determination? You’ll always remember voting for all times.”
Lead prosecutor Mike Satz concluded the state’s closing arguments by emotionally studying every sufferer’s identify saying, “The suitable sentence for Nikolas Cruz is the dying penalty.”
The prolonged trial noticed prosecutors name witnesses who recalled seeing academics and college students die and argue that the gunman had displayed racist and misogynistic conduct on-line previous to the bloodbath. Violent writings and drawings have been present in his jail cell within the spring.
In the meantime, the protection argued that his start mom’s alcohol abuse throughout her being pregnant led to his erratic and violent conduct.
In a uncommon transfer, jurors in August visited the location of the bloodbath, the place nothing had been modified from that lethal day greater than 4 years in the past, apart from the elimination of the victims’ our bodies and a few private gadgets. They walked previous dried Valentine’s Day rose petals scattered on classroom flooring, massive swimming pools of dried blood and bullet-ridden partitions.
Within the trial, forensic psychiatrist Dr. Charles Scott testified for the state that the gunman meets the factors for a analysis of delinquent character dysfunction, that means he confirmed no regard for proper and fallacious, and there was proof displaying he knew what he was doing.
“So, it’s not that he didn’t know or perceive that. He did,” Scott stated, NBC Miami reported. “It’s simply that [people] with a social character dysfunction, they don’t care.”
In Scott’s chilling testimony Oct. 4, he spoke of his jailhouse interview with Cruz, who instructed him he ended the taking pictures as a result of, “I didn’t have anybody else to kill.”
The trial additionally noticed pressure between the protection and Circuit Decide Elizabeth Scherer by which the gunman’s attorneys filed a movement for her to step down, accusing her of being biased, however she refused.
The movement got here after Scherer rebuked lead protection legal professional Melisa McNeill and her workforce exterior of the jury’s presence, accusing them of being “unprofessional” after they unexpectedly rested their case after solely about 25 of the 80 witnesses they initially supposed to testify had been known as.